Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: CPM Endorsement

  1. #11

    Re: Endorsement

    I find it's usually the idiots that write their own Bible that are at odds with the Living Word. They can't adapt themselves to scripture thus attempt to redefine their own cults according to their own lives. For example the plagiarized CNT has no John 8:1-15 (the adulterous woman) - I wonder why?

    We have Screwey Dewey Tucker who wants folks to think Christ is an ignorant redneck with his "Dixie Bible."
    Then we have Van Herrell, another exposed cop that was serving ZOG all along, with his A.S.T. (garbage).
    Now, enter 10th-grade dropout and delusional ZOG servant "warden" Finck with his "God's Penis" translation.


    ...and the Word of Yahweh still abides forever while such trash is vomited out for "adding to and taking away." You don't have to be a genius to know these are perverts and infiltrators, methinks. They can't stand on the Authorized because they're simply NOT risen by Yahweh, but self.

    I've NEVER heard anybody say Rabbi Finck is a "scholar" nor accepted as CI except from the whoremonger's many sockpuppets which are himself. That speaks volumes.

  2. #12
    Copying Visser since '98 Joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Lake Havasu City
    Posts
    373

    Re: Endorsement

    This raises a valid question. How do we Identists deal with those that are obviously retarded to everyone but themselves? In this I mean the stutterers and grunters like Marty and Bill that think they're smart because they're cracked and don't know any better?

    Is it best just to avoid or risk looking slanderous like them in being watchmen and pointing out their lunacy? I know Bill has zero creditability in CI so how much of a threat is he to us really?

  3. #13

    Re: Endorsement

    Leave them be, they are blind leaders of the blind.
    United Identity Church of Christ

    Now It's Your Choice! Will You take a Stand for God, Race, and Nation?

    http://www.scripturesforamerica.org/

  4. #14

    Re: Endorsement

    K-2 said
    “I find it's usually the idiots that write their own Bible that are at odds with the Living Word."
    Surely your not saying Wycliffe, Phillips, Van der Pool, Wuest, Williams, Beck, Herrell, Tyndale, Thomson, Brown, Comfort, Webster and Brenton are all idiots? I am amazed at such a comment.

    Continuing:
    They can't adapt themselves to scripture thus attempt to redefine their own cults according to their own lives. For example the plagiarized CNT has no John 8:1-15 (the adulterous woman) - I wonder why?
    That is is excellent question. Why Mr. Finck failed to explain this in a footnote is beyond me. May I quote Early Manuscripts & Modern Translations, Phillip Comfort , Baker Books, page 115:

    “The periscope about the adulteress woman (John 7:53 -8:11) is not included in any of the earliest MSS (second-fourth century}, including to to earliest, p66 and p75 (see photos 5 and 6. Its first appearance in a Greek MS is in D, but it is not contained in other Greek MSS until the ninth century. No Greek church father comments on this passage prior to the 12th century – until Euthymius Zigabenus, who himself declares that accurate copies do not contain it. When the story is inserted in later MSS, it appears in different places: after John 6:52, after Luke 21:38, at the end of John; and when it does appear it is often marked off by asterisks or obeli to signal it’s probable spuriousness. The story is part of the oral tradition that was included in the Syrian Pe****ta, circulated in the Western church, eventually finding it’s way into the Latin Vulgate, and from these into later Greek MSS, the like of which were used in formulating the Textus Receptus (Metzger).”
    This is why these verses are either bracketed or removed with footnote in almost all post KJV bibles except other strictly Textus Receptus based bibles.

    The Anointed New Testament by Herrell also omits it and discusses why in Appendix 4 pages 571-574. It is to long to quote but some of the important points are that the Vaticanus, Sinaitus and 25 pre-fifth Century fragmentary texts omit these verses which he does cite. He also said there are dozens texts that omit it. Phillip Comforts book confirms most of these references. So the evidence is overwhelming.

    You also said:

    Then we have Van Herrell, another exposed cop that was serving ZOG all along, with his A.S.T. (garbage).

    I have personal researched and studied Herrell AST and found it follows the Greek very well. It is one of the few NT texts that correctly translate racial words in the Bible which have had their definitions changed by later Judeo Christian Lexicons of the 19th and 20th Century. Don’t take my work for, check it out. The Internet Archive contains all the lexicons you need for free and a large number of the references he used, something that Herrell didn’t have available. He had to visit libraries nationwide to check this out.

    Also could you direct Forum members to what evidence that shows that
    ". . . Van Herrell, another exposed cop that was serving ZOG all along. . . "
    I know that I am not the only one on this Forum own owns a AST and would like to see this evidence.

    Last of all you stated:
    “For example the plagiarized CNT . . ”
    I am not a member of the Mr.Finck fan club but would you please cite the evidence that the CNT is plagiarized?

    Crossman

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,431
    Blog Entries
    7

    Re: Endorsement

    In my opinion of the no Satan doctrine. Disparate people say and expound on disparate things. As I learned to live in life; my opinion is shaped. Put out effort ,,,to get results.
    My clear answer is doctrine needs to be general and acceptable.

  6. #16
    Senior Member PHILnBOAZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Boaz, Al.
    Posts
    281
    Blog Entries
    4

    The Best online Ministry

    I would just like to say to all the folk out there that it has been a real pleasure to be here at this ministry. I have been at others that I will refrain from mentioning by name that was just to satisfy the so called pastors ego. I thoroughly enjoy the exchanges we have going on here. I despise the back-biting that goes on at other "ministries". Yah Keep and Bless you all!

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,431
    Blog Entries
    7

    Re: The Best online Ministry

    Glad to have the freedom to read your thread.

  8. #18
    Similar to Phinehas Pastor Visser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Brooks, GA
    Posts
    301
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: The Best online Ministry

    Thanks, Phil - we're glad to have your input!
    Pastor Visser @
    Covenant People's Ministry & Forums
    Box 256, Brooks, GA 30205

  9. #19
    Senior Member PHILnBOAZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Boaz, Al.
    Posts
    281
    Blog Entries
    4

    A TRULY GREAT MINISTRY

    I think we should all give each other, and Pastor Visser, thanks for the wonderful ministry we have going on here. I have belonged to other ministries, which will go unnamed, which were merely fan clubs of the person sponsoring it. Here we are allowed to express ourselves and our beliefs and share w/o being subjected to a very false and dangerous interpretation of our beloved Bible. I only wish we could all gather in one place. Pray for Crossman. He is in a lot of pain. Yah Bless and Keep You All !

  10. #20

    Re: A TRULY GREAT MINISTRY

    I will and I agree, Phil.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •