Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: CPM Endorsement

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member PHILnBOAZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Boaz, Al.
    Posts
    281
    Blog Entries
    4

    CPM Endorsement

    @christogenea you will see my name giving praise to the people that run that site. They have now taken my real name which I never posted by or with there and used it as they see fit. I no longer endorse them or their (his) Wm.-ology. My experiences there were pleasant to begin with. It doesn't take anyone, but someone brand new to the DSCI message, to realize that it is nothing but a fan club. While there I NEVER heard him say anything decent about any other pastor. Even the ones he provides sites for. There is a particular CI pastor who writes much commentary and his work speaks to me. I like his writing style and skills. They sent me numerous emails back-biting and praising themselves because, like Paul of Tarsus, they gave away. I don't know what their real mission is. Money, I suspect. So to all those who pass by there, just dare to speak your own mind or point out their flawed doctrines. They will accept any and all as long as you sing their praises. Do not be fooled! They have no doctrinal statement because there is no doctrine. You can believe in a literal Satan or not. You can believe in literal angels or not. Of course their most telling statement of faith is "If the KJV isn't good enough" just write your own N.T. What Blasphemy! So when you see my name there, it isn't necessarily what I've ever posted. If you ain't in the fan club and don't agree w/ everything they have too say...Beware. There really are tares amongst the wheat.

  2. #2

    Re: Endorsement

    Him and his mentor Martin Lindstedt will use hundreds of sockpuppets to speak for you, friend. Consider it a badge of honor. I originally signed up to ask how he considers "the sons of God" or angels to be non-whites yet after I got banned my account strangely lives on praising this guy as a "scholar" and "the greatest teacher since Paul." The same MO is used by this Lindstedt freak.

    Besides, I can't trust the jewdar of a clown who openly admits he worked with "a jew November" for years. You're in the right place. Stay with men ordained in the line of Swift, not these self-appointed twerps attempting to "correct" their doctrines and what has always been truth. ;)

  3. #3
    Hardcore DSCI seedliner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Hell On Earth!
    Posts
    2,035

    Re: Endorsement

    No, "real Christian pastors" threaten to sodomize men live on air:

    http://picosong.com/FYRY/

    Meanwhile, everyone in CI wonders how he claims OUR dual seedline title.
    “The righteous mother of the seven children spake also as follows to her offspring: I was a pure virgin, and went not beyond my father’s house; but I took care of the built-up rib. No destroyer of the desert, or ravisher of the plain, injured me; nor did the destructive, deceitful, snake, make spoil of my chaste virginity; and I remained with my husband during the period of my prime.” (4 Maccabees 18:7-8)

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,437
    Blog Entries
    7

    Re: Endorsement

    short comment... Proverbs chapter 28 verse 26-27 --- Philnboaz I agree with you. --- Great to write posts on a forum that helps spread Christianity to those who do not get represented very well. Yahweh bless this folks who run the site.

  5. #5
    Senior Member PHILnBOAZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Boaz, Al.
    Posts
    281
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Endorsement

    http://picosong.com/FYRY/ I have listened to this rant by "a real (self-appointed) pastor" several times. While I agree w/ the rabbi on several points he makes here it always comes down to "him". He loves to associate his name and works w/ Pastor Comparet and declares himself a follower of "A REAL Pastor" while disagreeing w/ him on most major doctrinal points. About the only thing the rabbi agrees w/ Pastor Comparet on is the "local flood" theory. He doesn't accept a Sabbath... so out the window w/ the 4th Commandment. Wonder what Paul would say about that rabbi ? Oh yeah, he loves to proclaim himself the great defender of Paul while tossing out most of his (Paul's) works and replacing them w/ his (rabbi's). I wonder if Paul observed a Sabbath, rabbi? I'm pretty sure YeHoShua did. You can also eat unclean meat (according to rabbi) as long as it doesn't offend your brother. He also loves to say he "gives" away all his work (like Paul did) while others like a contribution for some of their work. Sure, doesn't that enable him to reach more gullible people? Also there is no literal Satan or literal angels. In fact you can believe anything you want as long as you believe the rabbi. Sad thing is he has a real live fan club there. Much like Mickey Mouse has one. He now has my name plastered all over the place @ rabbi-o-genea singing his praises I'm sure. Only problem w/ that is, I NEVER posted anything there using my real name and so whatever is written there I'll not take credit for. If you remember, when I questioned him on doctrine, he used the user name "PHILonBOOZE" to publish whatever posts he attributed to me. This is "a real pastor" remember or so he proclaims. How about it rabbi ? And we know you are reading this and for whatever reason are infatuated w/ me. As "a real pastor" I tried to make peace w/ the rabbi and so once again he shows his true colors and continues to use my name @ the Rabbi's fan club while snubbing me on the "man to man" basis. I guess I should have expected that since he had to surrender his "manhood" while in prison and seek out the protection of the penal authorities. I guess this was before he accepted Christ as his savior and had to rely on "the man" for salvation. I forgive you rabbi...I just don't believe in you!

  6. #6

    Re: Endorsement

    I find it's usually the idiots that write their own Bible that are at odds with the Living Word. They can't adapt themselves to scripture thus attempt to redefine their own cults according to their own lives. For example the plagiarized CNT has no John 8:1-15 (the adulterous woman) - I wonder why?

    We have Screwey Dewey Tucker who wants folks to think Christ is an ignorant redneck with his "Dixie Bible."
    Then we have Van Herrell, another exposed cop that was serving ZOG all along, with his A.S.T. (garbage).
    Now, enter 10th-grade dropout and delusional ZOG servant "warden" Finck with his "God's Penis" translation.


    ...and the Word of Yahweh still abides forever while such trash is vomited out for "adding to and taking away." You don't have to be a genius to know these are perverts and infiltrators, methinks. They can't stand on the Authorized because they're simply NOT risen by Yahweh, but self.

    I've NEVER heard anybody say Rabbi Finck is a "scholar" nor accepted as CI except from the whoremonger's many sockpuppets which are himself. That speaks volumes.

  7. #7
    Copying Visser since '98 Joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Lake Havasu City
    Posts
    371

    Re: Endorsement

    This raises a valid question. How do we Identists deal with those that are obviously retarded to everyone but themselves? In this I mean the stutterers and grunters like Marty and Bill that think they're smart because they're cracked and don't know any better?

    Is it best just to avoid or risk looking slanderous like them in being watchmen and pointing out their lunacy? I know Bill has zero creditability in CI so how much of a threat is he to us really?

  8. #8

    Re: Endorsement

    K-2 said
    “I find it's usually the idiots that write their own Bible that are at odds with the Living Word."
    Surely your not saying Wycliffe, Phillips, Van der Pool, Wuest, Williams, Beck, Herrell, Tyndale, Thomson, Brown, Comfort, Webster and Brenton are all idiots? I am amazed at such a comment.

    Continuing:
    They can't adapt themselves to scripture thus attempt to redefine their own cults according to their own lives. For example the plagiarized CNT has no John 8:1-15 (the adulterous woman) - I wonder why?
    That is is excellent question. Why Mr. Finck failed to explain this in a footnote is beyond me. May I quote Early Manuscripts & Modern Translations, Phillip Comfort , Baker Books, page 115:

    “The periscope about the adulteress woman (John 7:53 -8:11) is not included in any of the earliest MSS (second-fourth century}, including to to earliest, p66 and p75 (see photos 5 and 6. Its first appearance in a Greek MS is in D, but it is not contained in other Greek MSS until the ninth century. No Greek church father comments on this passage prior to the 12th century – until Euthymius Zigabenus, who himself declares that accurate copies do not contain it. When the story is inserted in later MSS, it appears in different places: after John 6:52, after Luke 21:38, at the end of John; and when it does appear it is often marked off by asterisks or obeli to signal it’s probable spuriousness. The story is part of the oral tradition that was included in the Syrian Pe****ta, circulated in the Western church, eventually finding it’s way into the Latin Vulgate, and from these into later Greek MSS, the like of which were used in formulating the Textus Receptus (Metzger).”
    This is why these verses are either bracketed or removed with footnote in almost all post KJV bibles except other strictly Textus Receptus based bibles.

    The Anointed New Testament by Herrell also omits it and discusses why in Appendix 4 pages 571-574. It is to long to quote but some of the important points are that the Vaticanus, Sinaitus and 25 pre-fifth Century fragmentary texts omit these verses which he does cite. He also said there are dozens texts that omit it. Phillip Comforts book confirms most of these references. So the evidence is overwhelming.

    You also said:

    Then we have Van Herrell, another exposed cop that was serving ZOG all along, with his A.S.T. (garbage).

    I have personal researched and studied Herrell AST and found it follows the Greek very well. It is one of the few NT texts that correctly translate racial words in the Bible which have had their definitions changed by later Judeo Christian Lexicons of the 19th and 20th Century. Don’t take my work for, check it out. The Internet Archive contains all the lexicons you need for free and a large number of the references he used, something that Herrell didn’t have available. He had to visit libraries nationwide to check this out.

    Also could you direct Forum members to what evidence that shows that
    ". . . Van Herrell, another exposed cop that was serving ZOG all along. . . "
    I know that I am not the only one on this Forum own owns a AST and would like to see this evidence.

    Last of all you stated:
    “For example the plagiarized CNT . . ”
    I am not a member of the Mr.Finck fan club but would you please cite the evidence that the CNT is plagiarized?

    Crossman

  9. #9

    Re: Endorsement

    Im new to ci. I became and christian but could never understand why i didnt fit in with judeo, i always felt alone. Anyway its good to finally somewhat not be alone. I got into the older christogenea stuff at first also mixed with cpm. It took me a bit to figure out the whole situation but i think i made the right choice with you guys. Anyway i dont understand forum stuff very much yet but glad to be here

  10. #10

    Re: Endorsement

    Quote Originally Posted by Lazarus come forth View Post
    Im new to ci. I became and christian but could never understand why i didnt fit in with judeo, i always felt alone. Anyway its good to finally somewhat not be alone. I got into the older christogenea stuff at first also mixed with cpm. It took me a bit to figure out the whole situation but i think i made the right choice with you guys. Anyway i dont understand forum stuff very much yet but glad to be here

    Welcome, LCF. Glad you're here. You pretty much already figured out the forum stuff by making your post. No worries.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •