Covenant People�s Forums - Bible Tools & Teachers

After the flood. A must read.

daveUK — Sat, 04 Sep 2010 22:55:02 GMT

I have been trying to get Eli James to acquire and read this book for a long time.
So far he has not, so far as I can tell, even remembered about it. Certainly Bill Finck will find this book irresistible.

After the flood by Bill Cooper BA Hons, is a book in which the author lays out astonishing evidence showing how the earliest Europeans recorded their descent from Noah through Japeth in meticulously kept records. Their records of other nations lend chapters 10 and 11 of Genesis a degree of accuracy that sets them apart from all other historical documents of the ancient world.

In a book which is the fruit of over 25 years of research, Bill Coopers' book shows how European history can be traced right back to the flood and the descendants of Japeth through contemporary accounts and table of nations. The book contains irrefutable proof of the origins of the White European race with sources and citations, historical accounts and much, much more. Too much in fact to lay out here.

Bill Cooper is not CI and that fact makes the findings of his research even more compelling
and convincing. The only criticism one may have is that he tends to view history from the absurd 7000 year Earth age viewpoint which is typical of creation science, of which he is a proponent.
Indeed with so much evidence at his fingertips and the historical revelations he outlines, it is nigh impossible to figure how he, or anyone else for that matter, reading this book, could fail to realize the truth regarding the true 'identity' of the European peoples.

After the Flood by Bill Cooper, published in paperback in 1995 by New Wine Press. ISBN 187436740X and is available from amazon and elsewhere online. It is an absolute must for anyone CI or people wishing to learn more about the truth about Yahweh's covenant people. The white European race and the nations thereof.

The Talmudic Jew Identified by Pastor V.S. Herrell

malachi83 — Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:38:16 GMT

The Talmudic Jew Identified

by Pastor V.S. Herrell

The Jewish Talmud is the basis of modern Judaism. It has absolutely no connection to ancient Israel and the Hebraism of the Adamic, Israel people, but in fact the Talmud assumed its final shape long after the time of Jesus Christ. The Talmud is the text of the mongrel usurpers, those who claim to be the sons of Abraham but are not. The Talmud was originally compiled by the Edomites and Canaanites of whom our Lord spoke in John 8. These mongrel usurpers claimed to be of Abraham's seed (v. 33) and claimed that Abraham was their father (v. 39), but Jesus told them (39-47 AST):

"If you were children of Abraham, you would do the works of Abraham. But now you seek to kill Me ... If God were your father, you would love Me ... Why do you not understand My speech? Because you are not able to hear My Word. You are of your father the Diabolical One, and the lusts of your father you wish to do. That one was a murderer from the beginning, and he has not stood in the truth because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own, because he is a liar, and the father of it. ... He who is of God hears the words of God; for this reason you do not hear Me, because you are not of God."

This is one of the most important passages in all the Bible. Jesus here speaks to the Edomite Jews who claimed to be Israelites, who claimed to be descendants of Abraham, as do mongrel Jews today. But Jesus tells them several specific things, not for their benefit, but for the benefit of the true Israelite, the Adamic Christian.

Anyone claiming to be a descendant of Abraham, as do modern day Jews, but who does not do the works of Abraham, is not a descendant of Abraham and is therefore a mongrel usurper. If someone does not love Jesus, then he or she is not of God. Indeed, we read in I John 4:6 (AST) and I John 2:22-23 (AST):

"We are of God; the one knowing God hears us; he who is not of God does not hear us."

"Who is the liar, except the one denying that Jesus is the Anointed? This is the anti-Anointed, the one denying the Father and the Son. Everyone denying the Son neither has the Father; the one confessing the Son also has the Father."

The above verses mean that every single self-appointed Jew alive today, and anyone else who denies Jesus Christ, is an anti-Anointed or antichrist and a liar. Jesus repeatedly tells the mongrel Edomites that they are not of God, and He says that it is for this reason that they do not hear Him, but He also specifically tells these mongrel usurpers that they are not able to hear His Word. Saying that they are not of God means that they are not created beings; the mongrel racial status did not exist at the time of creation and was not among the things that God declared good, just before He instituted the principle of kind after kind in Genesis.

Rather, the creator, or father, of these Edomites was the Devil or Diabolical One, meaning that the Devil is the creator of mongrelization, not God. When the Christ says that the Devil was a murderer from the beginning, he is not specifically talking about Cain. He is saying that the Devil was a race-mixer or a race-murderer (guilty of genocide) from the beginning. It is very important that it be understood that these people to whom Jesus Christ was speaking, whom we know from context to be mongrel Edomites, were not able to hear His Word. Nothing they could do would make them able to hear His Word, because they were non-created beings. This verse means that there are those who are able to hear and those who are not. The blasphemous lie of predestination doesn't apply here either, because Peter has said:

"...[Jesus] not having purposed any to perish, but all to come to repentance."

But this verse is limited to created, Adamic beings, not the non-created sons of Satan or animals. I Peter 2:9 (AST) tells us:

"But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a Separated nation, a people for possession..."

So indeed there is a chosen race, but it is not these Edomite Jews who claimed to be the descendants of Abraham, or modern day, Khazar, Babylonian, mongrel Jews. But, in fact, these mongrels are the usurpers described in Revelation 2:9 (AST):

"... those saying themselves to be Judeans, and are not, but are of the Synagogue of Satan."

It was these Edomite, mongrel Jews - not the true Israel of God - who are quoted in Matthew 27:25 (AST):

"His blood is on us and on our children."

It was these mongrel Jew usurpers who murdered Jesus Christ. As John Chrysostom, a saint in both the Greek Orthodox and Catholic Churches, has said,

"The synagogue is worse than a brothel ... it is the den of scoundrels and the repair of wild beasts ... the temple of demons devoted to idolatrous cults ... the cavern of devils ... a criminal assembly of Jews ... a place of meetings for the assassins of Christ ... the refuge of devils."

After September, 70 AD, when more than 1,200,000 Jews were killed in Jerusalem by the Roman army, as Jesus had prophesied, those Jews who remained began to focus their attacks against Christianity and at the same time undertook efforts to corrupt the Hebrew Old Testament and compile the sayings and traditions of their rabbis. This destruction of the temple was by the judgment of Almighty God to bring that world or age to an end. It did not matter to these Talmudists that the Mosaic system could not legitimately exist without a standing temple and a sacrificial system, including officiating priests of the right bloodline, meaning Aaronian (which no longer exists). Thus, the Jewish Masoretic Text and the Jewish Talmud were begun by the non-ordained office of the Jewish scribes.

In effect, Judaism, as we know it, did not come into existence until the complete destruction of the Judean Israelite system, which was under the Mosaic law. Modern Jewry has never been under the Mosaic law and has been an illegal and imposter religion from its conception. Often, so-called theologians and churchmen, willingly ignorant of the true history, blaspheme and accuse Jesus Christ of being a Jew, but Christ Jesus, the Only-Begotten God, never subscribed to the teachings of the Talmud. He was therefore never a Jew by religion, nor was He a Jew politically speaking, bent on conquering the world through the philosophy of Babylonian Talmudism; that is, subscribing to world Zionist megalomania. Nor was He a mongrel Jew racially. The Bible teaches very clearly that He was the offspring and the "Root and Race of David" (Revelation 22:16 AST). He was therefore of the same racial make-up and genealogy as the great king David of Israel, whom the Bible describes as a white man.

"And he sent and fetched him: and he was ruddy, with beauty of eyes, and good in the sight of the Master. And the Master said to Samuel, Arise, and anoint David, for he is good" (I Samuel 16:12 LXX; cf. I Samuel 17:42).

The historian Josephus further describes David as having golden-blonde skin (Antiquities, VI:164). In fact, Jesus Christ could not have been the Christ if He had been a mongrel or a mamzir (bastard) in blood. For no mamzir or bastard could ever enter into the congregation of the everlasting Church of Almighty God (Deut. 23:2).

For these reasons, the Talmudic, Jewish religion is obviously an illegal one. Furthermore, this is stated by Jesus Christ Himself in the New Testament. Jesus said:

"Most assuredly, most assuredly, I say to you, he not entering through the door into the sheepfold, but going up by another way, that one is a thief and a robber. ... I am the door" (John 10:1, 9 AST).

"Jesus said to him, 'I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through Me. If you had known me, you would have known My Father also ... He seeing Me as seen the Father!" (John 14:6-7, 9 AST).

"And there is no salvation in no other One, for neither is there any other authority under Heaven having been given among men by which we must be saved" (Acts 4:12).

"Therefore, also God raised Him up highly, and gave Him authority above all other authority" (Philippians 2:9 AST).

Thus, Jesus says that those trying to enter into Heaven any other way than through Jesus Christ are thieves and robbers. You can either believe Jesus or not. If a person contradicts Jesus, he is not a Christian. Jews, from God's and the true Christian's point-of-view, do not have the right to exist as a religion - they are illegal. They do not have God for they do not have the Anointed. They are therefore phonies, imposters, and Christians are forbidden to condone their antichrist activities. Silly Graham has no business refusing to pray in Jesus' name simply because a bunch of God-damned Jews are present at the banquet.

We have documented elsewhere the corruption of the Masoretic Text and how the Jew has used this document to corrupt modern Judeo Christianity. Here we will quote the Jews in their own words; we will read a few passages from the Jewish Talmud, a book that is read every Saturday at synagogues throughout the world to teach so-called Jewish children and their proselytes not to love Christians, but to hate Christians and plot to overthrow Christianity at every opportunity (we must admit that they have been most successful in destroying America, which was once at least a nominal Christian nation, and turning it into a cesspool).

The Talmud teaches the racial superiority of the mongrel over the white man. Before beginning, we must first understand by what terms Jesus and Christians are referred to in the Talmud. Jesus is many times referred to vaguely with terms like "the son of a woodworker" (ben charsch etaim) or "the one who was hanged" (talui). When He is referred to by name, the Jews - who hate the name Jesus - call Him Yeschua or Yeshua, the same name that the so-called Jews for Jesus are using in modern, so-called Israel and in much of the United States and the rest of the world in order to further corrupt and destroy Christianity. The same Jews who made the Talmud also placed the vowel points in the Masoretic Text and changed the name of the Hebrew prophet Jesus to Joshua or Yeshua because the Jews hate the name Jesus. The Greek Septuagint records clearly that the translators of the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek in the 3rd century BC understood the name of the prophet, the son of Nun, to be Jesus, not Joshua or Yeshua.

The Jews who created the Masoretic Text changed it because they hate the name Jesus and so that they could also argue that Jesus' actual name was Joshua or Yeshua. Why did these Christ-murderers pick the name Yeshua to refer to Christ? The letters of the Hebrew Ieschya, correspond to the first letters of the phrase Immach SCHemo Yezikro, which means "May his name and memory be blotted out." These antichrist Jews probably got the idea for doing this from the early Christian custom of using the symbol of the fish in the Catacombs. In Greek, the word fish is ichthys, which corresponds to the first letters in the phrase Iesous Christos, Theou Huios, Soter or Jesus Anointed, Son of God, Savior.

So the blasphemous Christ-murderers, enemies of all that is sacred and holy (especially the holy seed of the true chosen race), who hate the name of Jesus, created the name Yeshua to make fun of the Christian usage of the word fish. Today, many so-called Christians have bought into this Jewish name for Jesus hook, line, and sinker, and in this way the Jews succeed in causing so-called Christians not to use the name that they hate so much, while they dazzle them with their sophistry. The sad truth is, most nominal Christians will not read their Bibles, and for most who do, they do not believe and obey what it says or tells them.

As we have said, in John, chapter 8, Jesus stated that the Edomite Jews, to whom He was speaking, were mongrels. The Edomite Jews recognized this accusation in verse 41, when they said, "we were not born of whoredom." This was a reference to the Greek phrase in Deuteronomy 23:2, which states that no one born of a whore (pornes), and therefore no mongrel, may ever enter into the Body Politic of the Lord. The phrase is referring to mongrels as further shown by the Hebrew of the passage. In Hebrew, the word for mongrel is mamzir, as found in Strong's Concordance, and this is the word used in Deuteronomy 23:2. So, in the Talmud, these spiteful antichrists referred to Jesus as a mamzir (Kallah, 1b (18b)). In the same passage, they also accuse Mary of having conceived Jesus during her menstruation (Sanhedrin, 67a). The Jews say that Jesus' mother Mary was a whore or stada. In Toldoth Jeschu, the Jews blasphemously say that at the ascension of Jesus, Judas also ascended, and the two fought, at which point it says, "and when Judas saw he could not win out over the works of Jesus, he pissed on Jesus, and both thus being unclean, they fell to earth."

In Sanhedrin 107b, the Talmud says, "Jesus seduced, corrupted, and destroyed Israel." In Zohar III:282, the Talmud says that Jesus is buried in that

"dirt heap ... where they throw the dead bodies of dogs and asses, and where the sons of Esau [the Christians] and of Ismael [the Turks], also Jesus and Mahommad, uncircumcised and unclean like dead dogs, are buried."

In Gittin 57a, the Talmud states: "Jesus is in hell and is being punished by being boiled in hot semen. Christians are boiled in ****." In Sanhedrin 105a-b, the Talmud says, "Jesus fornicated with his jack ass."

Thus, we would do well to explore these and many more comments in the Babylonian Talmud. We read:

"For murder, whether of a Cuthean by a Cuthean, or of an Israelite by a Cuthean, punishment is incurred; but of a Cuthean by an Israelite, there is no death penalty" (Sanhedrin 57a).

"Murdering Goim is like killing a wild animal" (Sanhedrin 59a).

"Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed" (Abodah Zara 26b, Tosefoth).

"Extermination of a Christian is a necessary sacrifice" (Zohar, Shemoth).

"Idolaters and non-Jewish shepherds of small cattle need not be brought up [from the pit] though they must not be cast in, but Christians, informers, and apostates may be cast in, and need not be brought up" (Abodah Zarah 26b).

"All Israelites will have a part in the future world ... The Goim, at the end of the world will be handed over to the angel Duma and sent down to Hell" (Zohar, Shemoth, Toldoth Noah and Lekh-Lekha).

"Tradition tells us that the best of the Goim deserves death" (Zohar, Shemoth, Vaikra Rabba 14b).

Throughout this article, we have exposed the Talmud and what it really says about Christians and "non-Jews." For this (as well as for other truths we have only begun to expose) the Jews wish us dead:

"A Goi who pries into the Law must be killed ..." (Sanhedrin 59a).

The Talmud advocates murder in all forms and fashions, including murder by failure to act.

"Therefore, if you see an Akum [Christian] in difficulty or drowning, do not go to his help. And if he is in danger of death, do not save him" (Hilkoth Akum, 10:1)

I wonder if this applies to Jewish doctors? Despite this above statement, the Jews have set themselves up as "great humanitarians," eager to come to the aid of all "humans in need." Thus the hypocrisy of the Jews is exposed. Also, it should be noted here the historical fact of Jewish ritual murder of small Christian children. Although a well-known fact of history, Jews today claim that Christians merely made up such stories to validate so-called pogroms against the Jews. However, we find the basis for Jewish ritual murder in the Talmud:

"Everyone who sheds the blood of the impious is as acceptable to God as he who offers a sacrifice to God" (Ialkut Simoni 245c. n. 772).

"Take the life of the non-Jews and kill them, and you will please God the same as one who offers incense to him" (Sepheror Israel 177b).

This, compounded with the other quotes of the murderous Jews, proves that Jews regard the murder of white Christians as an acceptable sacrifice. In fact, historical documents record instances of Jewish ritual murder. One such instance is recorded by a monk from the 12th century, Jocelin of Brakelond. His most famous work, Chronicle of the Abbey of Bury St Edmunds, is read in colleges around the country. He writes:

"It was at this time [1181] that the saintly boy Robert was martyred and buried in our church" (p. 15).

To this, the translators provide a note:

"[T]he death of the boy Robert, supposedly at the hands of the Jews, took place in 1181. Jocelin wrote his life, now lost. Similar deaths of children, which were alleged to have been ritual sacrifices by the Jews, took place in other cities '" (p. 128).

Of course, the translators are attempting to water down the truth of numerous historians' statements because the Jews have so deceived people into believing that they could never do such a thing. Naturally, the Jews do not consider it wrong to lie to goim. The Talmud states:

"And he who desires that none of his vows made during the year shall be valid, let him stand at the beginning of the year and declare, 'Every vow which I may make in the future shall be null.' (His vows are then invalid, providing that he remembers this at the time of the vow)" (Tractate Nedarim Folio 23b).

This is the basis for the "Kol Nidre" vow, which Jews are supposed to recite yearly. Thus, one can consider all words from the mouths of Jews to be lies and vows which they never intend to keep. Other statements regarding how Jews are to treat non-Jews are:

"Jews may befool and cheat the non-Jews" (Yore Deah 157:2).

"A Jew is permitted to rape, cheat and perjure himself; but he must take care that he is not found out, so that Israel may not suffer" (Choshen Ha'mishpat 348).

The weapon of usury is permitted against Christians (Iore Dea 159:1), as is perjury against Christians (Babha Kama 113a). This is evident in Jew bankers' and so-called businessmen's way of life, wherein they cheat and lie against non-Jews in order to take their money, their homes, their farms, or their countries. To make it worse, the Jews have, for centuries, hidden behind religion, even setting themselves up as religious authorities. Now, nominal Christians have been and are being deceived into believing that the Jews have preserved and remain knowledgeable about the true Biblical heritage and belief system. They even go so far as to seek the advice of Jews on how to be Christians! Yet, the Jews seek only to deceive and mislead those white men and women who would seek the truth, and in doing so they keep hidden their true beliefs and desires:

"To communicate anything to a Goi about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the Goim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly" (Libbre David 37).

It is this fear which drives the Jew mongrels to commit open genocide against the White Race through race-mixing, deception, and hiding behind the easily manipulated blacks. Mongrels can do nothing but mongrelize and destroy that which Almighty God had originally created. Christians are told "What God yoked together, then, let no man put apart" (Mark 10:9 AST). Every page of the Jewish Talmud is filled with Jewish filth. Such filth is not limited to the advocacy of the murder of white Christians, but also contains numerous sexual and otherwise perversions. In fact, they go so far as to blaspheme and lie against the Scriptures:

"Adam had intercourse with every beast and animal, but found no satisfaction until he cohabited with Eve" (Yebhamoth 73a).

Remember, Jews believe the Talmud to be superior to Scriptures. Thus, they firmly believe this statement although it is not in the Bible.

"Baby girls bring dire punishment on those who have intercourse with them when they are menstruating" (Sanhedrin 55b, 69a).

It is common knowledge that baby girls do not typically menstruate. This passage does, however, show the Jewish obsession with female menstruation, and entire books have been devoted to this topic in the Talmud. This passage further implies that when they are not menstruating, it is all right to have intercourse with them. This is stated explicitly in other passages. Furthermore, what filthy mind would even contemplate such an act? Obviously, that of the mongrelized Jew. A typical Jew will always be for maligning a Christian's sense of decency. He will always be advocating more and more open perversion. Homosexuality among Jews, for example, is not seen in the same way that it has been traditionally been seen by white people. The Talmud further states about child molestation:

"When a grown man has intercourse with a little girl, it is nothing, for when the girl is less than three years old, it is as if one puts a finger into the eye - tears come to the eye again and again; and so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years" (Kethuboth 11b).

"When a grown man has had sexual intercourse with a little girl less than three years old or when a small boy less than nine years of age has intercourse with a grown up woman, or when a girl was accidentally injured by a piece of wood [during masturbation] ... there is in regard to them no charge of non-virginity" (Kethuboth 11a).

Indeed, the Talmud states that a child aged "three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition [sexual intercourse]" (Sanhedrin 55b). Perhaps this is why Jew lawyers and judges are so fond of putting child molesters back on the street to molest again. All Jews are potential child molesters. Child molestation is advocated elsewhere in the Babylonian Talmud:

"Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that" (Sanhedrin 52b).

"A Jew may sodomize a child as long as the child is less than nine years old" (Sanhedrin 54b).

The commentator then explains that "if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred." The Talmud also advocates necrophilia:

"Sexual intercourse is permitted with a dead relative regardless of whether he or she was single or married" (Yebhamoth 55b).

Again, only a disgusting Jew could advocate such a thing, and then pretend he is the "chosen of God." When will white men and women wake up and take a stand against the filth that is a Jew? The Talmud also states that if a Jewess has sex with her own son, she is only unfit for the priesthood if the boy was older than nine years (Sanhedrin 69b). The Talmud further states:

"A woman came before Rabbi Hisda confessing to him that the lightest sin that she committed was that her younger son is the issue of her older son. Since this was her lightest sin she was excused" (Abodah Zarah 17a).

These and all such forms of perversion are permitted by the Talmud in the statement:

"When one finds that evil appetites are taking hold of his senses, let him repair to some place where he is unknown; there let him dress himself in black and indulge the impulses of his heart" (Mo'ed Katan 17a).

Of course, these are permissible crimes against other Jews. The Talmud advocates the rape of innocent white children as well:

"A non-Jewish girl who is three years old can be violated [raped]" (Aboda Shara 37a).

"Inasmuch as a non-Jewish child at three years and a day is suitable for copulation, her raper is only unclean until the evening, when he is clean again after taking a dip in the water" (Choschen Ha'mischpat).

"A Jew may violate [rape] but not marry a non-Jewess" (Gad. Shas. 2, 2).

And, as stated before, the hatred of Jesus Christ that the Jews feel is also expressed in the Talmud. No one who calls himself a Christian could dare speak kindly of a Jew after reading what the Jews think and teach of the Only-Begotten God, Jesus Christ. Remember, a Jew stands in danger of being kicked out of the synagogue if he dares tell the truth to a white Christian about what is secretly taught to Jewish children from the Talmud. This is the primary reason that the Jews have kept alive their perverted form of German known as Yiddish and other perversions of Spanish. To quote Paul, it is a shame to speak openly of what they do in secret.

"For know this, that every whoremonger, or unclean person, or greedy person, who is an idolater, has no inheritance in the government of the Anointed and of God. Let none of you be deceived with empty words, for through these comes the anger of God on the sons of disobedience. Be not then partners with them, for you were then in darkness, but now in light in the Master. Walk as children of light. For the fruit of light is in all goodness, and justice and truth - proving what is well pleasing to the Master. Do not have fellowship with the unfruitful actions of darkness, but rather dishonor them. For it is shameful even to speak of the hidden things being done by them. But all things being dishonored by the light are clearly manifested, for everything having been manifested is light. Therefore, he says, 'Arise, sleeping one, and stand up out of the dead ones, and the Anointed will shine on you'" (Ephesians 5:5-14 AST).

The filthy Talmud goes on to blaspheme Jesus by saying:

"Jesus fornicated with his jackass" (Sanhedrin 105a-b).

"Jesus is in hell and is being punished by being boiled in hot semen. Christians are boiled in ****" (Gittin 57a).

These blasphemous and terrible statements are just the beginning regarding what Jews have to say about the Anointed One, Jesus Christ, our Savior. The Talmud teaches lie upon lie regarding Jesus. They begin with his very conception, teaching that He was the son of "Mary of Magdala," a prostitute (Sanhedrin 67a), and that his father was an "evil spirit" who came upon Mary while she was menstruating (Kallah 1b [18b]). The lying Jews further state that Jesus, "the son of Stada [a prostitute]" practiced "Egyptian magic" and was a "fool" (Schabbath Folio 104b). Regarding Mariam (Mary), the Talmud further states: "She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters" (Sanhedrin 106a-106b).

As stated before, the Talmud says: "Mar said: Jesus seduced, corrupted and destroyed Israel" (Sanhedrin 107b). Yet, the Bible records that Jesus was the Deliverer and Savior of true Israel; that is, white Christians. Furthermore, although the Bible teaches that Jesus rose from the dead after being crucified and placed in a tomb for three days, the Talmud states that Jesus is buried in a dirt heap with dogs. The Jews must believe, then, that it is in this pit or grave that Jesus is being boiled in hot semen and Christians in ****.

This also is but the beginning of what the filthy, antichrist Talmud has to say about Christians. First and foremost, we Christians, the true Chosen of God, are called idol worshippers by Maimonides, a Jew renowned and adored by World Jewry:

"And be it known that Christian people who follow Jesus, although their teachings vary, are all worshippers of idols" (Abhodah Zarah Perusch 78c).

Furthermore, although it is the Talmud which advocates bestiality, it is Christians who are accused of performing such indecent acts with animals. Perhaps the Jews believe that the real sin is not bestiality, but that a goi would perform acts reserved for Jews:

"Animals must not be allowed to go near the Goim, because they are suspected of having intercourse with them. Nor must women cohabit with them because they are over-sexed" (Abhodah Zarah 22a).

"Non-Jews prefer sex with cows" (Abodah Zarah 22a-22b).

This accusation seems to be a running theme with modern Jewish comedians, as they seek to attack the nobility of the honest farmer and his innate intelligence through the perverted use of humor by describing the dumb, hayseed farmer having sex with cows. It is clear that most Jewish so-called jokes are truly over the heads of most goim, but white men can count on one thing from the Jew - they are laughing at Jesus Christ and the destruction of the white race. Thus, Christians are accused of bestiality, while the Talmud states:

"A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a Jewish priest. A woman who had sex with a demon is also eligible to marry a Jewish priest" (Yebamoth 59b).

"When Rabbi Dimi came he related: It once happened at Haitalu that while a young woman was sweeping the floor a village dog covered her from the rear (a case of unnatural intercourse) and Rabbi permitted her to marry a priest" (Yebamoth 59b).

Furthermore, children must not be allowed to be taught by Christians:

"... nor must children be given into their care to learn to read or to learn a trade" (Abhodah Zarah 15b).

Of course, the Jews have today taken over the public school system, and private school systems for that matter, and have used them for the dumbing down of white children and to promote their own Zionist, antichrist Humanism which has deceived and led astray millions of white children. The integration of the schools has resulted in the genocidal death of many more. If white Christians had control of the schools, which the Jews cannot allow, perhaps they might be used for a truly educational and Biblical purpose.

Of course, the Talmud prohibits such activities, because in so doing, the lies of the Jews would be exposed and they could no longer control white people for material gain. The Jewish agenda of genocide and oppression could no longer be maintained if white children were to receive a true education, which is their birthright that has been stolen by mongrels and Jews. It is for similar reasons that the Talmud states that the Christian birth rate must be decreased and kept at low levels (Zohar II 64b). The Jews are currently succeeding in this respect. Mongrels are breeding at a higher rate than ever, while white people who consider themselves Christians are indoctrinated with the belief that they must maintain a small family. Many have only one or two children, if any at all, and these are raised in the lies of the Jews. Jews also control the economy, forcing white men to work even up to three jobs and five months out of the year just to pay taxes, thus decreasing the number of children white men can support.

The filthy Talmud further states that Christians are animals who only have the appearance of man:

"But Akum [Christians] were created for the sole end of ministering unto them [the Jews] day and night. Nor can they ever be relieved from this service. It is becoming to the son of a king that animals in their natural form, and animals in the form of human beings should minister unto him" (Midrasch Talpioth, Folio 225d).

The Bible teaches clearly that mongrels, like the Jews, are non-created beings, and therefore do not even deserve the status of animals, which were created and pronounced good by Almighty God.

Other Talmudic writings comparing Christians to animals are:

"Jews are human beings; the other peoples of the world are not human beings, but beasts" (Baba Mezia).

"The sexual intercourse of a Goi is like that of a beast" (Sanhedrin 74b, Tosephoth).

"The seed of a Goi is worth the same as that of a beast" (Kethuboth 3b).

"You can read: Remain here with the ass, that is, with a people like an ass. Hence it appears that they are not capable of contracting marriage" (Kidduschim 68a).

"For they give birth to sucklings the same as dogs" (Zohar II 64b).

Yet, the Jews once again show their hypocrisy. The Talmud permits Jews to "pretend to rejoice with them in order to hide your hatred" (Iore Dea 148 12 Hagah). We see this practice in full force today. Jews often come pretending to be our friends, while in truth their only desire is to destroy and enslave. As the Scriptures declare: "The thief does not come except that he may steal, and kill, and destroy" (John 10:10 AST). This is the purpose of the Jews, and their diabolical plan is contained within the filthy Talmud. Synagogues truly are the house of Satan, where Jews perpetuate their blasphemous lies and plot to destroy Christianity. Yet, it is the Jews who call Christian churches "Beth Hattiflah," or "House of Evil." Truly, Jews are fond of projection statements.

The Jews also blaspheme and deride the New Testament in this diabolical and evil book called the Talmud. The Gospels are called "volumes of iniquity" and "heretical books" (Schabbath 116a Tosephoth). These books are to be burned (Schabbath 116a). And as the Jews are fond of saying, those who burn books soon burn people. Indeed, we have already shown from their own Talmud where the murder of Christians is advocated.

It is a common picture on the news today to see Jews advocating for the removal of Christian literature from all areas of society, as well as ridiculing Christian literature and worship. Thus far, Christ has been removed from so-called secular society. America was not settled or intended to be a humanistic, secular society, but rather a Christian nation. The world Zionist Talmudists will not stop with the destruction of the United States until all Christianity is destroyed. To the Jew, it matters not how Christianity is destroyed, whether with bullets or bayonets, or even with perversion. It matters only that real Bible Christianity is destroyed. Jews even go so far as to call Christian literature hate literature and attempt to pass laws banning it. Again, support for this is found in the Talmud. In Iore Dea, Jews are instructed to refer to Christian literature with contempt (hatred) (146,15) and deride it at all times (147,5). When Jews speak of the separation of Church and state, their primary concern is with eliminating the positive influence of Christianity on innocent, little children and eradicating any Christian establishment, yes, even nominal Christian.

The astounding truth is, as we have proven in this article, that the Talmudic Jews and so-called Jewish religion were never a part of the ancient religion of the Hebrew and Israelite people. The Talmud, which is admitted even by world Jewry to be the final authority for the practice of Judaism, is still called the Babylonian Talmud. Christians need to know and understand clearly that when the nation of Judah-Israel was captured by the Babylonians and taken into captivity in 586 BC, a considerable number of those Judeans found the lifestyle and pleasures of Babylon among the Akkadian blackhead or mongrel people to be seductive and quite attractive. Because of this, the majority of Judeans did not even want to return to Judea to rebuild the nation and the temple. They had simply become materialistic and began to seek to corrupt the Hebrew religion and twist to conform to the teachings of the Babylonian Talmud, which were the teachings of the mongrel Babylonian people.

However, when the Medes or Persians defeated Babylon in 538 BC, it was found that a great number of the Persian Army was then composed of displaced Israelites from the ten tribes of northern Israel that had earlier been taken into captivity by the Assyrians in 722 BC and had found their freedom either by purchase or by escape to fill the ranks of the Persian Army. In other words, many of the Medes turned out to be cousins to the captured Judeans. Therefore, the Medean-Persian king Cyrus financed and protected the resettlement efforts of the Judeans. I Esdras 2:3-5 (LXX) states:

"Thus saith Cyrus king of the Persians ... If therefore there be any of you that are of his people, let his Lord be with him, and let him go up to Jerusalem that is in Judea, and build the house of the Lord of Israel: for he is the Lord that dwelleth in Jerusalem."

Approximately 90 years after this initial effort of King Cyrus, Esdras and Nehemiah were given additional power to take a remnant of true Israelites back to Jerusalem in Judea-Israel to once again re-establish that Israelite nation and rebuild the walls of the city as had been prophesied by Gabriel in Daniel 9. Thus, in 445 BC, Artaxerxes allowed Nehemiah to return and rebuild the walls of the city.

"And it came to pass in the month Nisan of the twentieth year of King Arthasastha [Artaxerxes II Mnemon], that the wine was before me: and I took the wine and gave it to the king: and there was not another before me ... And the king said to me, For what dost thou ask thus? ... I ask that thou wouldest send him into Juda, to the city of the sepulchers of my fathers; then will I rebuild it."

The foundations of the temple had been begun earlier in 536 BC under Cyrus by the first Judeans to return, but the work was delayed. Then the temple was finished in 515 BC. When Esdras returned to the city for the dedication of the city walls, it was reported to him that many of the men of Israel had taken mongrel wives; Esdras 8-9 documents that Esdras dealt with this problem and purged the Judean community in Jerusalem of the mongrel element.

This mongrel element came about because as time went on, many of the Babylonian apostates, who had mongrelized their race, sought to return to the Commonwealth of Judea. But the great Esdras purified the nation by demanding that the Israelites put away their mongrel wives and children if indeed they wanted to remain a part of the great Commonwealth of Judea-Israel. Thus, for a while, the mongrelization was checked.

In 332 BC, Alexander the Great conquered all of Palestine. After his death, his kingdom was divided and the rule of Palestine passed to what would be known as the Seleucid kingdom. Eventually, Antiochus IV Epiphanes inherited the rule of this Judea. The Seleucid rulers had brought a Hellenistic influence to Judea, including the Greek language. History records from Josephus as well as Philo that many of the Judean Israelites were seeking to adopt Grecian customs and ways, even having Greek gymnasiums or schools and wearing Greek clothing to identify more closely with their Greek racial cousins. But Antiochus Epiphanes was continuously challenged and insulted by many religious zealots and he made the historical mistake of desecrating the temple and pouring pig soup all over the altar. Josephus records in Jewish Antiquities XII:5,

"[Antiochus] left the temple bare, and took away the golden candlesticks, and the golden altar, and table, and did not abstain from even the veils, which were made of fine linen and scarlet. He also emptied it of its secret treasures, and left nothing at all remaining... And when the king had built an idol altar upon God's altar, he slew swine upon it, and so offered a sacrifice neither according to law, nor the Judean religious worship in that country."

The Judeans rebelled in 168 BC and the zealot Maccabee family came to power under the leadership of Judas Maccabaeus, a priest. By 164 BC, the temple was reconsecrated. Judas died in 160, and then other members of his family inherited power. But the mongrel elements would gain power with the rule of John Hyrcanus (134-104 BC). Hyrcanus conquered the Idumaeans or Edomites and these Edomites supposedly converted to Yahwehism. This was the beginning of the major usurpation by mongrel elements of the leadership of Judea. The sheer numbers of Edomites conquered also made them numerically superior to the pure Israelites.

The Bible records that at one time the Edomites were a racially pure people (Deuteronomy 23), but they were overtaken by mongrels and themselves became a mongrel people. Therefore, the children of Israel later in their history were to kill the Edomites whenever they were encountered, just as David had done.

Yet, this mongrel group of people that the Children of Israel were to kill were now in power. The tables had been turned. With this new Edomite mongrel element in control, the focus of the Judean nation then turned toward attacking Greek cities and other white cities. Within thirty years of John Hyrcanus' rule, the power over all of Judea would fall into the hands of the Edomite Antipater, the father of Herod.

In the midst of Antipater's and Herod's rise to power, the world was conquered by Rome, including Egypt and Judea. It was principally because of this that the mongrel, Edomite, Herodian family seized the opportunity to gain political power with the backing of the Roman Army. Thus, by the time of Christ, the nation of Judea was both ruled by and predominately populated by mongrel Edomites. These Edomites and the Edomite Herods were not white Israelites. They could not be sons of Abraham biologically, and it was these Edomites (who had usurped the Judean nation) that brought in more and more Edomites and flooded Judea with mongrels. They began invading the Israelite institutions, such as the priesthood, the scribal offices, and even the Sanhedrin, the ruling government of the elders of Judea. The Edomite Herod had not only his own political party and machine, but he also had a very fanatical religious party which was composed of mongreled Babylonian Jews, Edomites, and other non-whites who were seeking to claim Israelite citizenship. But they were never true believing Hebrews, nor did they ever truly keep the Mosaic law. The mongrels were jealous of the white priesthood and sought to continuously destroy it, either by murder or by racial genocide; that is, seeking to interbreed with and destroy the purity of the Aaronian priesthood.

These apostate Israelites had gained so much power and had made such inroads into corrupting the true Judean establishment that John the Baptist was denied his birthright to be high priest in Judea-Israel at the time of Christ. A mongrel named Caiaphas had bought and bribed his way into that institution. This is the same mongrel spoken of in Matthew 26:3-4 (AST):

"Then the chief priests and the scribes and the elders of the people were assembled to the court of the High Priest, Caiaphas, and consulted together how they might seize Jesus by deceit, and kill him."

It is therefore very important for people to understand that the Bible never says that Jesus of Nazareth was a Jew. It specifically says that Jesus was a Judean. The Bible never says that Jesus was King of the Jews. The Bible says that Jesus was King of the Judeans, and this was a title imposed upon Him in sarcasm by the Romans. The modern term "Jew" refers to these mongrel, Edomite usurpers who practice the teachings of the Babylonian Talmud. The term "Judean" refers to the white, Israelite Adamics who lived in Judea and who were actual pure descendants of Abraham. The distinction in these two terms is of the utmost importance for understanding the Bible.

Nominal and deceived and willingly ignorant Judeo, so-called Christians like to argue that Jesus was a Jew biologically. But the Bible does not teach that Jesus was a Jew or a mongrel biologically. The Bible says that Jesus was of the tribe of Judah, not the tribe of Jews. Jesus was a white Israelite, a true son of Abraham, Jacob, and Isaac. Jesus was a devout Hebrew who kept the law of Moses faithfully. The law of Moses was from the Bible and had absolutely nothing to do with the Babylonian Talmud. Talmudic Jews do not believe the Old Testament, nor do they obey the Mosaic law because it is absolutely impossible to do so - there is no standing temple or animal sacrificial system. Ironically, it was the Jews behind the scenes that orchestrated the putting in the Bible of the slang word Jew instead of Judean. For although the things said of them in one or two passages is most derogatory, particularly John 8, still they believed that they would gain more than they would lose by convincing people that Jesus was somehow a Jew and not a Judean.

A person of the tribe of Judah is not a Jew. He would have been an Israelite Hebrew. The only way that a person of the tribe of Judah could be a Jew would be to become an apostate Devil worshipper and turn his back upon the Hebrew Scriptures. It is absolute blasphemy of the Word of Truth for preachers to call Abraham a Jew. Neither Abraham, Isaac, nor Jacob was a Jew, and there was no tribe of Judah or any other of the twelve tribes of Israel until they were established through the sons of Jacob, who was the grandson of Abraham.

Now, what we have stated in this article are clear, explicit facts. For anyone who calls himself a Bible believer or a Christian to deny these Biblical facts is to blaspheme the Holy Spirit of God. For the Holy Spirit of God is also the Spirit of Truth, and no lie is of the truth. There is considerably more that could be said about so-called world Jewry and the world Zionistic movement and the apostate, illicit, so-called religion of the Jews. World Jewry has virtually destroyed Christianity throughout the world through its relentless barrage of antichrist propaganda and continuing effort to completely misrepresent what the Bible actually says and teaches. Again, it is important for Christians to understand and believe that the One, True, Living God has not changed; Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever (Heb. 13:8). No real Christian can sanction or give consent or any kind of approval to the antichrist movement of Talmudic Judaism and Zionism. Any so-called Christians doing so, regardless of denomination, forfeit any salvation afforded them by the Living Christ, and they will burn in the Lake of Fire along with the mongrels and all liars and all who help make a lie.

White man, white woman, do not let yourself be robbed of your birthright as the chosen race and chosen seed of Almighty God. The New Testament tells the white Christian in I Peter 2:9 (AST):

"But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a Separated nation, a people for possession, so that you may speak of the virtues of the One Who has called you out of darkness into His marvelous light."

SUPPOSE WE ARE ISRAEL WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?

malachi83 — Thu, 02 Sep 2010 04:37:47 GMT

SUPPOSE WE ARE ISRAEL

WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?

By

James S. McGaw D.D. (UK)

PRACTICALLY every great discovery has had to travel the rocky road to popular recognition. The truth concerning Ten Tribed Israel is no exception to this well nigh general rule.

While, ordinarily, that which has been patently revealed cannot he called a discovery, the hiding and bringing to light of what has been revealed can be so classed; especially when it remained hidden from the great body of Bible students and commentators through the centuries. For this reason the discovery of the facts summed up in what is known as "The Israel Truth" ranks among the highest of Biblical attainments in the last one hundred years.

Archeology, Biblical research and modern translations have done wonders in substantiating the validity and in the elucidation of the Word of God. But all of these are subservient to and corroborative of the great discovery that God is a God of order; that He actually devised a plan and program for the redemption of our planet; that, essential to that plan and program, he chose Ten Tribed Israel; and that they are extant on the earth today.

But like the prophets of old, this great truth has met with indifference, unbelief and opposition. Even the great evangelistic prophet Isaiah could say of his day: "Who hath believed our report?" Jesus knew that the same spirit would be manifested in our day and accordingly presented the Kingdom parable of the sower; in which He cites four kinds of hearers and warned the disciples that the only kind of hearers which could be depended upon to receive the Kingdom message were the "good and honest hearts." He told His disciples just how it would be in our day when He said:

''As it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man."

Noah earnestly proclaimed the coming of the flood but the people of his day "knew not," did not care to know, until the flood came and swept them all away.

The Apostle Peter, also speaking of our day, says:

"Know this also that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking in their own lusts, and saying, Where is the promise of his coming? For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the world."

The veteran Paul describes another type as "Ever learning, but never able to come to the knowledge of the truth," and "As Jannes. and Jambres withstood Moses, so also do these resist the truth." Some of them do it by outspoken opposition; some, by seeking to thwart its proclamation; some, by engaging in whisper campaigns of criticism.

Of the outspoken opposition, it can be said that they make excellent converts when their spiritual blindness clears away and they see the truth. As for those who devise devious methods and those who work in the dark, Jesus said:

"The disciple is not above his master, nor the servant above his lord. It is enough for the disciple that he be as his master, and the servant as his lord. If they have called the master of the house Beelzebub, how much more shall they call them of his household? Fear them not therefore; for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known."

As for the scoffers, multitudes have come to scoff and remained to pray.

There is a great host of conscientious Christians who desire to know the truth but are afflicted with the spiritual blindness described by Paul in Romans 11:25:

"For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened unto Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in."

Regarding the Jews, Paul said:

"Their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the veil untaken away in the reading of the Old Testament, which veil is done away in Christ. But even unto this day when Moses is dead, the veil is upon their heart. Nevertheless when they shall turn to the Lord, the veil shall be taken away."

But the blindness in Ten Tribed Israel in reading Moses and the Old Testament, Paul says, was to continue "until the fulness of theGentiles be come in." The "Times of the Gentiles" closed when General AIlenby took Jerusalemin 1917. The "Fulnessof the Gentiles" is manifest in the enormity of human perfidy now being displayed by the dictator nations as their cup of iniquity rapidly fills to the brim. - (Joel 3:13) The hour is close at hand, when Ten Tribed Israel will experience the great awakening foretold by the prophets. The blindness will pass away in the spiritual light which shall break upon their souls regarding their identity and their responsibilities as the chosen people of God. Multitudes in our own and many other lands are already awake and taking their places among the cohorts of the Almighty for the closing days of the age. In presenting the Israel Truth, it is therefore wise to heed the admonition of Paul to Timothy:

"The servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient, in meekness, instructing those who opposed themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth."

In this spirit we now take up the study of a special type of evasion of the Israel Truth which is very frequently used by some of our fellow professed Christians. When the truth of Israel's identity is presented and can not be gainsaid, they propose to pass it all up by saying "Suppose we are Israel. What of it? If I am saved, what difference does it make?" That reply comes so often that it is worthy of consideration, not only for the good of the cause but for the good of the person who makes it.

The spirit in which the statement is made ranges from mere flippancy to sincere declaration.

With regard to the flippant, each case calls for a decision regarding what should be done. Solomon advises us: ''Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou be like unto him"; and then in about the same breath he says: ''Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit." Whether coming from the flippant or the conscientious Christian, the statement "Suppose we are Israel; what difference does it make?" assumes a serious aspect. Few, if any,of those who make it have considered for a moment its true import. We, therefore, would analyse the spirit which prompts the statement and the implications involved. At once it is evident that there exists a very shallow knowledge of the Bible and a careless disregard for its sanctity.There is here the manifestation of an egotism unbecoming a child of God. It smacks of the idea that God set in operation all that is revealed in the Scriptures solely to save the individual, and when that is, accomplished, what else is worthy of consideration? There is also present a form of selfishness. If the individual is saved; what difference does anything else make?

Aside from the mental state which the question in each instance, so eloquently portrays, there is an attitude of heart and soul, thus declared, which should be a matter of serious concern to the professed Christian, when weighed in the light of things spiritual and divine.

Taking for granted, as is here done, that we really are Israel as revealed in the Word of God, the question "What difference does it make?"!

LACKS REVERENCE

It discloses the want of due regard for God and His Word. That soul needs to learn what Moses learned that day in the desert when the Voice from the bush told him to remove his shoes for the ground on which he stood was holy ground. That soul needs to learn the lesson taught by Uzziah's tragedy; realized by Isaiah, when in the temple, he saw the Lord high and lifted up; exemplified by John on the Isle of Patmos when he beheld the divine messenger and fell at His feet as dead; and proclaimed by the angels when they veil their faces and cry "Holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty!"

The spiritually minded ever remember that God is holy and His Word holy; that man lives by every word which proceedeth out off the mouth of God; and that the words which He speaks "they are Spirit and they are life," whether found in the Old Testament and the New Testament, whether proclaimed by the eminent divine or the humble scrub woman. No one can wave aside the acknowledged truth of God with "What difference does it make?" without irreverence.

PRESUMPTION

"Suppose we are Israel; What difference does it make?" There is here, plainly implied, the fact that the speaker does not intend to accept or live by it anyway. This assumes the right of the individual to look the Word of God over, select what suits his whim or fancy and discard the balance. But Paul made it very plain to Timothy that

''All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works."

The Bible, as given by God is a complete whole. It stands or falls in one piece. It declares the whole counsel of God and it required nothing short of the whole book to declare it. Otherwise, much of it would not have been written. It must be accepted in its entirety.

It is not, therefore, within the province of man to go through the book, sorting and picking this and that, which he proposes to accept and say with regard to the remainder "What difference does it make", To do so is the height of presumption.

INSULTS, STULTIFIES ONE'S OWN SPIRITUAL INTELLIGENCE

"What difference does it make?" bespeaks an attenuated idea of the Scriptures and the great purpose of God in furnishing them to mankind; or, a closed mind; or, a spiritual indolence which does not want to be disturbed.

However, in the fact that we are Israel, there is opened up a vast field of Biblical knowledge upon which many eminent scholars have bestowed years of careful study and painstaking research. There is presented, for our enlightenment, a great volume of information, involving the origin and history of the various races of the earth, the divine plan for the ages, the division of the world into the Israel and Gentile nations, the marvelous covenants made by God, the exceeding broad sweep of the atonement, the place allotted the Church in God's world program, the meaning and movement of the present world crisis, who constitute the Kingdom of God on earth, what it will be when it comes, Israel's work for the new age, the new order under the reign of Christ and the ultimate restitution of all things which were lost in Eden.

This is but the briefest outline of the great educational field that lies before the student of Israel Truth, and it certainly is no compliment to ones intelligence to flip it aside with "What difference does it make?"

It made a great difference to the scholars who dug deep into the Bible and human history to bring forth the golden nuggets of truth concerning the people God chose for His name. It makes the difference of being informed or ignorant of God's purposes, the place He gave His elect people in His program and His march down the centuries toward fulfilment. It makes the difference of merely being saved by the skin of one's teeth, as Job put it, and being an intelligent student of the Bible and world events, thus being "thoroughly furnished unto all good works" in our day and generation.

What a difference exists between the mental and spiritual appetite of the evader of truth and that of the prophet Jeremiah when he said:

"Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and the rejoicing of mine heart, for I am called by thy name, 0 Lord God of Hosts!"

DISPARAGES THE WISDOM OF GOD

God, in His wisdom, chose Israel to be used by Him in His great plan for the transformation of a lost world. He also wrote a large portion of the Bible to tell us about Israel's part in that plan. Can we not see that to select only a portion of the Book, and that only the portion which pertains to one's individual salvation, is to simply tell God that He was silly in furnishing any more? Can we not see that it sets up the finite in judgment of the Infinite? It practically declares Him to be foolish in doing any more or revealing any more than would get us saved eternally.

REPUDIATES ABOUT FIVE-SEVENTHS OF THE BIBLE

Allowing ample space in the Bible for the presentation of the Gospel to the individual, God wrote about five sevenths of the Bible as His message to the nations. An important integral part, related to almost every phase of this revelation, is the great nation Israel, promised by God to Abraham. Five sevenths is a lot of Bible to scrap, brother. The hypercritical at their worst do not have the temerity to attempt any more; and they are busy all of the time knifing the Scriptures, cutting out and deleting. One of their modern achievements is called "The Polychrome Bible," in which they have made the book an infidel aurora borealis by printing the words they criticise in the various colours of the rainbow.

But the "What difference does it make?" folks throw away five-sevenths of the Bible in one lump. The infidel critics do their work piecemeal, while these believer critics do theirs wholesale. They virtually say: 'This will I accept, enjoy and live; but God's message to the nations -'What difference does it make?.'" That statement - literally -

THROWS AWAY THE KEY TO THE BIBLE

Earnest Bible students have found the Israel Truth to be the key which opens up the Bible from the first promise made at the Fall, until Jesus delivers up the finished Kingdom unto God.

It may be likened to a spiritual thread which runs through almost every chapter of Bible history, every doctrine, symbol, type, promise, covenant and act of God: The thread which, when found, makes possible the unravelling of most of the mysteries of the Word. This is the reason that everyone who has conscientiously sought and found the Israel Truth has declared the Bible to be a "new book;" consistent, harmonious, symmetrical, progressive and most satisfying to mind and soul.

Without the Israel Truth, as is evidenced in the commentaries and "helps," the Bible becomes the field of conjectures, an array of wonderful, for the most part, disconnected stories; and a grabbag of beautiful texts with out much of any reference to the context, or where the truth of the text fits in the Divine scheme of things. We recently met a Southern mountaineer who in his droll manner said that which every Bible student should note: "A text, without the context, is just a pretext."

Take the whole Gospel of individual salvation wherever presented in the Word of God, and careful study will almost always disclose the fact that the Israel Truth is the context that makes it plain and sets it in its proper spiritual perspective. The story of the birth of Jesus is a sample of how the Israel Truth is woven into the warp and woof of His life as He fulfilled prophecies and types which had long before been established and proclaimed in Israel. It can therefore be positively stated that no man can understand even Jesus, His mission and His message, without the Israel key which opens up the treasures of His marvellous life and teaching.

BELITTLES THE FAITHFULNESS OF GOD

If we are Israel, then God has done a stupendous thing. He has kept faith with Abraham. Centuries ago He made an unconditional, irrevocable, covenant with Abraham to increase and preserve his posterity throughout all generations. And now, here we are, many nations of Israel, right here on the planet after almost 4,000 years.

What kind or grade of Christianity is it that can see in that nothing to excite gratitude, joy and praise for a covenant keeping God? The Sweet Singer of Israel wrote some of his most wonderful songs in appreciation of that faithfulness. In the metrical version of Psalm 89:1, he sings:

"The loving kindness of the Lord

Forever I will sing;

Thy faithfulness to every age

My mouth in song will bring."

And in the same version of Psalm 105:8, we find:

"He keeps in mind his covenant

That it may ever stand,

And to a thousands ages He

His promise doth command.

"His covenant with Abram made,

He unto Isaac swore,

Confirmed the same to Israel,

A bond for evermore."

The writers of the four Gospels constantly call attention to God's faithfulness to Abraham. The Apostles, everyone of them, gloried in it; - but "What difference does it make?"

REJECTS THE BIRTHPLACE OF RACE

The man who has the blessing of personal salvation is the recipient of a marvellous gift of God in Christ Jesus. He receives what may be called his birthright; by which he becomes heir of God and joint heir with Jesus Christ; one of those to whom God says:

"All are yours, and ye are Christ's, and Christ is God's."

Bound up in the bundle of life with God and Jesus Christ, there is no spiritual blessing for time or eternity that is not included in the rights of his rebirth - the birthright of grace. Endless ages will never conclude our praise of God for that blessing. But this does not for a moment warrant the despising and rejecting of the other God given birthright - the birthright of race; which is always done when a man says: "Suppose we are Israel; What difference does it make?"

It made quite a difference to Esau who despised his birthright of race. Afterward he found no place for repentance, although he sought it with tears. The die was cast, his descendants became the Turks of today.

The birthright of race made quite a difference to Ishmael, the son of the bond woman, Hagar. His descendants are the Arabs.

The birthright of race also made quite a difference to the sons of Keturah, whose descendants are the Brahmins of India.

"Suppose we are Israel," then we are the lineal descendants of Abraham through Sarah, Isaac and Jacob. There is a world of difference in the blessings of race, country, enlightenment and opportunity bestowed upon the descendants of these and that which was bestowed upon the Brahmins, the Arabs, and the Turks.

While there is no place here for race pride, there is a large place for grateful joy in the arbitrary goodness of God, and for appreciation of the gifts bestowed by God upon us as.a race. The conscientious Christian is certainly among those who follow after righteousness and who seek the Lord. Isaiah 51:1, 2 was written for him. In that Scripture, God directs him to take two looks of appreciation, joy, thanksgiving and encouragement in birthright of race. Thus it reads:

"Hearken to me, (God is speaking, not an Israel preacher) ye that follow after righteousness, ye that seek the Lord: look unto the rock whence ye are hewn, and to the hole of the pit whence ye are digged. Look unto Abraham your father, and unto Sarah, that bare you: for I called him alone, and blessed him, and increased him."

"Suppose we are Israel;" then we are the recipients of the only God ordained royal blood on this planet through Abraham, the divinely appointed father of kings,and through Sarah, the Princess, mother of Kings - (Genesis 17:6, 16) And, if we will receive it, that royalty accounts for many of the racial characteristics of the Israel nations, which stand out so clearly today in contrast to the Gentile dictator nations.

"Suppose we are Israel," then we participate in the great covenant made by God with Abraham, so comprehensive that it included all the covenants which followed it, both temporal and spiritual. In fact, if we be Israel, then that covenant of God was made directly with us; for God definitely stipulates:

"I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee." - (Genesis 17:7)

Note that the "seed" of Abraham in this promise is plural.

Can it be possible that it means nothing to the believer to be chosen of God as an heir of that covenant, which, in all of its ramifications, God unfolds through the remainder of the Scriptures? Is it a light thing to be the heir of the grand legacy made certain to the Israel people through God's oath to Abraham? Well, as the present world conditions come toward their conclusion, there will be a mighty multitude who will rejoice that they live under the provisions of that gracious covenant.

"Suppose we are Israel," then we are members of the Kingdom of God on earth. He established that Kingdom at Sinai. Constituting that Kingdom was twelve-tribed Israel. Matthew 21:43 tells us plainly that He took the Kingdom from the Jews and turned it over to a "nation" (Greek, "Ethnos" which never could mean church). That nation was to bring forth the fruits of the Kingdom. Those fruits are both political and religious.

The Israel nations, Finland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Holland, Belgium, Switzerland, the British Commonwealth and the United States of America are the only nations on earth which have made the law of God, the Ten Commandments, the common law of the land; the only nations which have established their form of government after the model given at Sinai with its constitution, laws, statutes and judgments. Does the fact that a man is saved eternally, preclude the possibility of his appreciating the civil blessings which he enjoys under the Abrahamic covenant in these Israel countries? A short sojourn in the Gentile lands of the dictators would show the difference and be quite convincing.

The other fruits of the Kingdom of God on earth which were to be brought forth by the Israel nation were religious.True to Christ's assignment, the Israel nations, lead the world in evangelistic work, home and foreign missions, church extension to the ends of the earth, Bible translation, publication and distribution. The United States and the British Commonwealth hold the record for fully ninety per cent of this work. Is it possible that all of the civil and religious freedoms and blessings vouchsafed by a covenant keeping God to these countries have never impinged themselves upon the heart and soul of a man because, by the grace of God, he was saved? What must the God of Abraham think when such a man flouts the whole of it and says "Suppose we are Israel what difference does it make?" Well, brother, it is not good Bible Christianity to hug the covenant of grace so close to our heart that we have no room for God's covenant of race. That sort of thing,

SPURNS THE HONOURS CONFERRED BY GOD

The man who has his eyes on the skies in contemplation of the glories, honours and emoluments which God will confer in the life to come, cannot serve God or his own highest spiritual welfare by spurning the honours which God has bestowed upon him, here on earth, as one of his Israel people.

It does not require great research to find a host of texts in which God reveals the exalted position given to his chosen race. A few, however, should suffice:

Isaiah 43:1,4. "But now thus saith the Lord that created thee, O Jacob, and He that formed thee, O Israel, Fear not for I have redeemed thee, I have called thee by thy name, thou art mine..... Since thou wast precious in my sight, thou hast been honourable and I have loved thee"

I Kings 8:53. "Thou didst separate them from among all the people of the earth, to be thine inheritance."

Psalm 135:4."For the Lord hath chosen Jacob unto himself, and Israel for his peculiar treasure."

Deuteronomy 7:6 "For thou art an holy people (set apart for God's use) unto the Lord thy God: the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth."

Deuteronomy 14:2 "The Lord hath chosen thee to be a peculiar people unto Himself above all the nations that are upon the earth."

God has certainly lavished the honours and blessings upon Israel and, in the few texts cited, there is enough to give the Israel Christian abundant reason for joy and thanksgiving. Note the honours conferred: He chose them, redeemed them, claimed them for his own, separated them, calls them precious, his peculiar treasure, his special people, his inheritance above all the peoples of the earth.

Think of any believer reading all of that and then turning upon his heel and saying "Suppose we are Israel: What difference does it make?" Well, let us suppose again. Suppose the king of a great empire assembled his armies on the plain, thousands upon thousands of them, and, as they stood at attention, he should call out of the ranks one man and announce that he had chosen him to be his intimate aide de camp; and, in the presence of the vast multitude, he should pin upon his breast the badge which signified the honours, titles and emoluments conferred. Suppose that young man responded to all of this by simply taking the medal and nonchalantly flicking it into the air. We can easily imagine the consternation it would cause in the king and in the ranks. Yet this is the treatment God receives from those who say: "Suppose we are Israel: What difference does it make?"

REJECTS GOD'S COMFORT FOR THE LAST DAYS

When we go through the Scriptures, and find the blessings promised by God to Israel, it is most remarkable that, in very many instances, the blessings foretold are for the last days, the very hour in which we are now living. For us, upon whom Paul says, the ends of the age have come.

The blessings pronounced upon Abraham were to culminate in the last days. The blessings pronounced by Jacob upon his sons were for the last days. The farewell blessings proclaimed by Moses upon twelve-tribed Israel were to befall them in their latter end, the last days. It is very evident that God was quite anxious that His Israel people should have a clear vision of all that was to come to pass in these trying times, and consequently, sent prophet after prophet, telling of world conditions which we would experience in our day.

But right along with the cataclysmic upheavals foretold, there is always a word of cheer, consolation and encouragement to His people Israel. Though they may be chastened sore, yet, he says, "I will not make a full end of thee." God will not forget His covenant to Abraham, though the nations rage, the earth quake and the seas roar.

Therefore, it is the universal testimony of all who have sincerely studied the Israel truth and accepted it, that there has come upon their minds and hearts, like a divine benediction, a peace, a calm, a comfort and an encouragement in the present world crisis, such as they had never known before.

To collate all of the statements God made to Israel for the last days, would furnish a soul fortification against all that is transpiring, which few Christians know anything about. In the very day when men's hearts are failing them for fear, and they are leaping from windows, shooting themselves or passing out by monoxide gas; God, in His mercy, intended that we should have the benefits of knowing what He is doing in the world, what the world events actually mean, how he is going to make it all work out to the good of His people Israel, and through all that is happening bring in the Kingdom of God on earth.

But all of this falls upon listless ears to the man who says "What difference does it make?"

TURNS DOWN THE HIGH CALL OF GOD

The high call of God is not only to accept Christ and to build a Christlike character, but to gain a broad, genuine, comprehensive Biblical knowledge, in order to be thoroughly furnished unto every good work. It is not simply to preach the Gospel in obedience to the Mark 16: 15 commission; but also in obedience to the Luke 9: 2 commission- "Preach the Kingdom of God."

The Kingdom of God on earth, lost in Eden and to be restored by Christ, is the one theme of the Bible. It was the one theme of all that Jesus preached. It has a message for the individual. Matthew 6: 31, 33 is also the great message of God to the debauched, broken, floundering nations of the world today.

The laws of that Kingdom of God established at Sinai contain the only answer to the problems which now confront the nations, whether those problems be political, economic or social. In fact, the Gospel of the Kingdom sweeps the whole field of human relationships, the family, the church, the business world, the social world, the state, the nation, and international relationships. There is no phase of human life that it does not cover and command; for "His Kingdom ruleth over all."

After years of acquaintance with the whole field of Gospel preaching, we have no hesitancy in saying that the Israel Truth comprehends the Gospel in its fulness. The Israel movement takes the Bible as it finds it, with no denominational tenets to promote, and preaches what it finds; without fear or favour. It is enlisted to declare the whole counsel of God whether men will hear or forbear; the Gospel of Christ in its fulness; the Old Testament Gospel, the New Testament Gospel, the Gospel of Sinai, the Gospel of the Prophets and the Gospel of the Apostles; the Gospel for the individual with salvation for body and mind as well as soul; and the great neglected Gospel, the Gospel of the Kingdom of God on earth.

God chose the Israel people as His servant race and appointed them His witnesses to set up the ensign of divine truth to the nations of the world. If there ever was an hour when such a work was needed, it is now, as the nations wade in their welter of woe.

That Christocracy which God set up at Sinai with its constitution, law, statutes and judgments is the sunrise for which the world is now waiting. Brother, Sister, can you conscientiously face your Master and say: "I'm saved. Suppose we are Israel; what of it? What difference does it make?" To use a street term; "Come out of it." The world is languishing in its national sins as well as its individual sins. The great Divine climax of the ages is about to break upon the nations. God, in His mercy, has given the great Gospel of the Kingdom of God on earth, not merely to be held but to be heralded in these closing hours of a dying age. Now is the time to earn your "Well done, thou good and faithful servant," promised in that great Kingdom parable.

DR JAMES S. MCGAW

Dr James S.McGaw, the author of this tract, was a Scots Covenanter. He was a life-long minister in The Reformed Presbyterian Church. For seventeen years he represented the National Reform Association, which took him on speaking engagements into 46 states. It was his interest in Christian civil government which laid the foundation for a ready acceptance of the national message of the Bible.

His conversion to this great truth was occasioned by a Jew who owned a haberdashery store in a small mid-western town. Dr McGaw stepped into the store to make a purchase on his way to the depot. Attracted to Dr McGaw by his mannerism, the Jew guessed he was a minister, which resulted in a friendly conversation on religion. Becoming interested, the proprietor called his son from a back room of the store to take charge while he took the doctor to the train.

Indebted to the Jewish merchant for his graciousness, Dr McGaw took this opportunity to speak to the man concerning the claims of Jesus Christ. One approach after another failed. So finally in a final desperate attempt to win the man before the train arrived, Dr McGaw said, "The Jews are God's chosen people, and Jesus was a Jew, therefore you ought to accept Him as your own personal Saviour."

''Ah, ah," said the Jew, "this is where you are mistaken."

Taken back by this retort the doctor said, "Well if the Jews are not the chosen people, I'd like to know who are." The Jew answered, "If you really want to know who the chosen people are, read Judah's Sceptre and Joseph's Birthright, by Bishop Allen." (Destiny Publishers, Haverhill, Mass.) Dr McGaw gulped for breath at this sudden turn of events, which blasted all his theological training. So he determined to get the book and read it. It was almost a year before he was able to secure a copy. Then in the quietness of his room, the first night with the book and his Greek and Hebrew text beside him, he became so intrigued with its message that he could not lay it down until he was suddenly confronted with the breaking rays of the morning sunrise. As the sun arose he finished the book with the light of a new truth in his soul.

Subsequent studies made him a master of the NATIONAL MESSAGE OF THE BIBLE, and one of the strongest speakers on the American platform, always speaking with authority in his discussions. His two studies, "Outline Studies in the Covenants of the Bible," and "The State Religion of Israel, or Symbolism of the Old Testament Ritual," have never been equated in their comprehensiveness and lucidity. His own testimony as to the value of this truth is stated in the following words:

"The revelations brought to me through the study of the 'Israel Truth' have definitely established my faith in the Bible as the inspired Word of God and proved to my complete satisfaction that God is a God of order, manifested in a mighty plan and program unfolded in the eight covenants, the prophets and the Gospels, and fulfilled in and through the special creation of His chosen people Israel. With this vision, the sixty-six books of the Bible are seen to be a complete disclosure of God's love, and a marvellous unit, symmetrical, coordinated, harmonious and progressive from Genesis to Revelation.

"I thank the 'Israel truth' for making the Bible a new book to me and for a fully rounded Gospel of salvation for the individual and redemption of the nation to be preached in these last days of a dying age, linked with a lively realization of the coming Kingdom of God on earth. I shall never cease to be grateful to the Jewish friend who suggested that I read Judah's Sceptre and Joseph's Birthright.

You can order this from Kingdom Identity Ministries...

GREEK MYTHOLOGY AND THE BIBLE

malachi83 — Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:20:53 GMT

GREEK MYTHOLOGY AND THE BIBLE

WE began our series in part one with a look at the Old Testament roots of Norse mythology. In that study, we saw that the beliefs of the Norse bore a striking resemblance to the religion and culture of the Hebrew, Canaanites, Assyrians, and Babylonians. These cultural "cross-currents" were not unusual, and indicate a Semitic wave of colonisation in early Europe.

Let's continue our series with a closer look at Greek mythology and see if the Bible in the Apocrypha is correct in I Maccabees 12:21, where we read:

"It has been found in a writing concerning the Lacedaemonians (Greeks) and Jews (Judah), that they are kinsmen, and that they are descended from Abraham."

Yes, Israelites colonised Greece in early times, and the Greek religion shows us proof of an Hebrew origin, as stated in the Apocrypha in the Bible.

The most well known Greek God-hero was the one known as Hercules (the Latinised form of the Greek "Heracles"), whose most distinguishing characteristic was immense physical strength. Interestingly enough, the "Encyclopedia of the Classical World," states, " The tales of his heroic deeds lend to the supposition that Hercules was originally an historic figure." Who do we know in the Bible that exhibits a like characteristic? The answer, of course, is the Israelite hero known as Samson, whose life was detailed in the Bible in Judges chapters 13 through 16.

One important event in Hercules' life involved his escaping from the clutches of a symbolic woman, who is called "Pleasure." This corresponds directly to the troubles Samson got himself involved in with the harlots of Canaan.

But the most celebrated event in the life of Hercules involved the labours he was ordered to perform by God through the Oracle of Delphi. (Incidently, "12" was an important divine number in Hebrew religion.) What do you suppose was the very first labour Hercules had to perform? You might have guessed it! He had to slay a lion with his bare hands! Let's read a paragraph from the book, "God's Heroes and Men of Ancient Greece " by W.H.D.Rouse:

"Heracles threw down his bow and arrows and leapt upon the lion's back... while he put his hands round the lion's neck ...gripped the lion's throat with his two hands, and bending him backwards, throttled him. There lay the lion dead on the ground." (p. 59). In our Bible, Judges 13:6 says that Samson actually tore the lion in two, but the ancient historian Flavius Josephus in his "Antiquities of the Jews" also tells us that Samson first strangled the lion,which is exactly as Hercules is said to have done. I don't even know if there ever were any lions in Greece. The Biblical Archaeologist Magazine somewhat tersely comments, "lions, we may remark are not frequent in Greece." (59:1, p.17). In fact, the Greek myths explain this one away as the offspring of a monster! But whether there were lions in Greece is not important; Hercules needed to find one anyway. Why? Simply because the Biblical Samson inspired the Greek legend called Hercules, and provided the basis for his life!

Another of Hercules' labours involved his live capture of a wild animal, which he brought home and threw at the feet of Eurystheus. In Judges 15:4, Samson is said also to capture live wild animals, which he released in the com fields of the Philistines.

A fascinating bit of additional information regarding Hercules is his connection with the Biblical tribe of Dan. The Bible Samson was born of the tribe of Dan. (Judges 13:2-25) Greek history tells us that a people called 'Danioi' came to trade and colonise Greece in ancient times, settling in a region called "Argos". The word Hercules in Greek is 'Heracles,' which is virtually identical with the Hebrew plural word for traders, 'Heraclim,' and Heracles is said to have come from "Argos", himself. The Greek myths tell that the Danioi were descended from a patriarch 'Danaos' who was the son of 'Bel,' and sailed from Egypt. In the Bible, the Hebrew patriarch Dan was the son of the concubine 'Bilhah' (Genesis 30:3-6), and the Israelites were in Egypt at the time that 'Danaos' set sail to Greece from there! Heracles, further, is said to marry a girl named 'Hebe,' an obvious and well-known short form of the word, Hebrew! Since the tribe of Dan were traders and colonists who did so much sailing that they "stayed in their ships" (Judges 5:17), it is not surprising to find such connections with ancient Greece.

In another tale from Greek mythology, we read how God through the oracle at Delphi seemingly ordered a king to sacrificially slay his son Phrixos, as a sign of his obedience to God.. But let me quote the story from my Greek commentary:

"The oracle said, kill Phrixos and Helle at the altar for a sacrifice, or your com will grow no more. This was a dreadful blow to the king; but he had to obey what he believed to be god's wish, like Abraham and Isaac in the Bible. And in this case, too, there was a ram, but a different sort of ram from the ram which was sacrificed instead of Isaac. There stood at the altar the two children, ready to be killed; there stood the sacrificer with his knife; there stood the king, full of sorrow, and 10 and behold, down came the ram, and up got the boy and girl upon his back, and away he flew into the sky" (Ibid. p. 92). This is obviously not an exact retelling of the story of Abraham's near-sacrifice of Isaac, but an historical kernel obviously exists, which was corrupted into the present Greek mythology over time. Another interesting Bible comparison can be made with the Greek hero Achilles, who could only die by having his heel wounded. What a strange story to tell! That is, it would be strange were it not for the fact that we read such an account in the Bible in the form of a prophecy concerning the coming Christ in Genesis 3:15:

"I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed: it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel."

It can easily be seen how a misinterpretation of this verse (especially in the early pre-Christian centuries, before Christ's fulfilment of prophecy was made manifest) could inspire a story of someone dying through a wound in his heel!

The strong connection between the Hebrew and Greek civilisations is well known to scholars of ancient history. Perhaps the leading American archaeologist of the twentieth century is Cyrus H. Gordon. The Biblical Archaeologist Magazine (March 1996, p.22) reported, 'Professor Gordon had been delivering a popular lecture on 'The Common Background of Greek and Hebrew Civilisations,' particularly about the Heroic Age both in Late Bronze Age Greece and in pre-monarchic Israel.Citing the Iliad of Homer and the Biblical book Samuel, he pointed out that the heroes David and Achilles performed essentially the same warlike exploits in search of imperishable glory, the only bulwark against oblivion. The milieu of Achilles and of David were therefore closer to one another than was that of Achilles to Classical Greece or that of David to the Age of the Prophets in Israel.Following the lecture, a little old lady wide-eyed with astonishment and admiration, made her way up to the distinguished lecturer and asked, 'Does that mean, Professor Gordon, that Achilles was Jewish?' This insightful woman was on the right track in her thinking, for the ancestors of the early Greeks were Israelites, as the close parallels between the religion of these two nations implies.

Near-Eastern scholar, Dr. Louis H. Feldman, concurs with this in a lengthy article in the same journal pointing out the connection between Greek mythic literature and its source in both the Bible and Mesopotamian religion. He states, "Likewise, Mondi (1990:187) cites the parallel between the Homeric shield of Achilles":

"And upon it he made the earth and the sky and the sea, the tireless sun and the waxing moon, and all the constellations which wreathe the sky." - (Iliad 18.483-485)

And Psalms 136:5-9:

"to him who made the heavens, the earth upon the waters ....the great lights.... the sun.... the moon and the stars."

Dr.Feldman continues, "Furthermore, the scenes on the shield of a city at peace in which the leaders are dispensing justice, repelling aggression, and harvesting, while the king stands by watching happily correspond to the description in Psalm 72." An obvious inference is that the Greek myths are so chock full of Hebraisms because of Hebrew colonisation of Greece in ancient times.

Parallels with Assyrian and Babylon religion are also commonplace in Greek mythic literature. On this, Dr.Feldman comments,

"Furthermore, there are parallels in motifs between Near Eastern epics and Homer. In the first place, as Professor Gordon, followed by Considine and Walcot... noted there are eight striking parallels between the Baal-Anath text 137,where Baal is restrained from doing violence to the envoys by the goddesses Anath and Ashtoreth, and the scene in the Iliad (1. 188-222), when Achilles is about to slay Agamemnon, but is restrained by the two goddesses, Athena and Hera."

Dr. Feldman's article continues on these themes for many pages, proving without doubt the connection between Greece and the Near East, including Israel, in very early times. Feldman concludes by saying,

"Some would say, as they did with Professor Gordon's "Homer and Bible" (1955) and "Before the Bible" (1962), that several of these parallels are commonplaces; but the total effect is what counts. There is now fairly general agreement that the near east ...influenced Homer." (ibid. p.19).

It is clear that early Greek mythology shows evidence of not only Hebrew, but Canaanite, Assyrian, and Babylonian religious culture. That the Greek religion could be influenced by so many streams of different Semitic culture may seem incredible until we remember that Israelite religion was also influenced by these same foreign nations. This heavily mixed amalgam may therefore have been brought to Greece by the Hebrews themselves. At the very least, the strong evidence of Hebrew colonisation and culture in ancient Greece should not be ignored.

The story of the Noahic Flood is also told in Greek mythology, where Deucalion and Pyrrha built a wooden "chest" to save them. Historian Olive Beaupre Miller,in "A Picturesque Tale of Progress " says,

"The similarity of these flood stories [Greek and Hebrew] is interesting. Here, as in the Bible, the flood is sent to destroy mortals because of the evil in the world, the chest goes aground on a mountain top and the survivors at once offer sacrifice."

Before closing this discussion on Greece and its ancient ties to Hebrew religion, it is interesting to mention that the Greek god-hero, "Adonis," also received his name from the Semitic word, "Adon" or Lord. For example, one of the New Testament titles applied to Christ was "Adonay."

THE GOD WHO IS ABOVE ALL GODS

Greek heroes such As Hercules and Achilles were called children of God, but they were not immortal. they lived on earth, died, and their spirits were believed to sometimes be lifted up into heaven. Above these heroes in importance and power were said to be a pantheon of Gods. Yet some of the Greek people also worshipped a One True God, eternal in the heavens, unnamed except to be called "the Unknown God." This brings us down to New Testament times, where we pick up the rest of our story in the seventeenth chapter of the Acts of the Apostles (verses 22 -23).

"Then Paul stood in the midst of Mar's Hill and said: Ye men of Athens, I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious; for as I passed by and beheld your devotions, I found an altar with this inscription: To the Unknown God. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him I declare to you."

Yes, these people were not adopting a new religion with the coming of Christianity, they were rediscovering their old religion in its purified form, as sent unto them by our Lord in the flesh, Jesus Christ. By God's design, our forefathers forgot who they were, where they came from, and what their past religion was, all in His plan of purifying and preparing them to again become united with the One True God, who came unto them in the form of man, Jesus Christ.

Video: James Wickstrom Speaks About ZOG Corruption at Public Rally

Obadiah 1:18 — Sat, 28 Aug 2010 12:06:29 GMT

SHELDON EMRY THREAD

malachi83 — Mon, 23 Aug 2010 21:26:08 GMT

http://www.christianidentityministries.com/Emry.html - Sheldon Emry
http://www.israelect.com/reference/SheldonEmry/sermons/ - Found Works in Audio MP3
http://www.israelect.com/reference/SheldonEmry/studies/ - Found Works in Textual PDF
http://www.churchoftrueisrael.com/emry/ - Sermons by Pastor Sheldon Emry
http://www.amprom.org/index.php?opti...id=1&Itemid=62 - Pastor Sheldon Emry(America's Promise)
http://www.artisanpublishers.com/emr...don-c-929.html - Emry, Sheldon(Artisan Publishers)
http://www.sheldonemrylibrary.com/ - The Sheldon Emry Memorial Library

"Verboten" By Thomas O'Brien

malachi83 — Sun, 22 Aug 2010 00:39:46 GMT

"Verboten"
ELEVEN BIBLICAL ESSAYS
ON SUBJECTS
CAREFULLY AVOIDED BY
TODAYS CLERGY

By Thomas O'Brien

This book is dedicated to the most courageous spokesman for the White Race.
A dynamic speaker with a brilliant mind who preached the truth concerning the
Identity of Israel and the coming Kingdom of God here on earth, the late
Dr Wesley A Swift

http://www.churchoftrueisrael.com/verboten/

The Thirteenth Tribe

malachi83 — Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:53:51 GMT

READ ONLINE

http://www.solargeneral.com/library/13-tribe.pdf - The Thirteenth Tribe

By Arthur Koestler

Pastor James Wickstrom Interviews Rabbi Abe Finkelstein

Obadiah 1:18 — Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:22:31 GMT

Pastor Wickstrom makes minced woodchips out of Rabbi Finkelstein, who sounds oddly like Pastor Bob Jones doing a very bad jew impression.

The Ben Williams Library

malachi83 — Sat, 14 Aug 2010 00:31:50 GMT

The Ben Williams Library

http://www.benwilliamslibrary.com/

How the Irish Saved Civilization

Obadiah 1:18 — Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:53:12 GMT

This is a fascinating audio book, read by Liam Neeson, which details how Irish Israelites preserved the classic literature of our race during the Middle Ages.

In this delightful and illuminating look into a crucial but little known "hinge" of history, Thomas Cahill takes us to the "island of saints and scholars," the Ireland of St. Patrick and the Book of Kells. Here, far from the barbaric wars that plagued the European continent, Ireland's monks and scribes laboriously and lovingly preserved the written treasury of the West. Many great pieces of Greek and Roman literature, almost sure to be lost in the chaos of the Middle Ages, were saved by the monks of Ireland. This brilliant audio edition of the bestselling book is read by acclaimed actor Liam Neeson.

In this delightful and illuminating look into a crucial but little-known "hinge" of history, Thomas Cahill takes us to the "island of saints and scholars," the Ireland of St. Patrick and the Book of Kells. Here, far from the barbarian despoliation of the continent, monks and scribes laboriously, lovingly, even playfully preserved the West's written treasury. When stability returned in Europe, these Irish scholars were instrumental in spreading learning, becoming not only the conservators of civilization, but also the shapers of the medieval mind, putting their unique stamp on Western culture.

CLICK ON LINK, THEN SELECT "REGULAR DOWNLOAD"

Forgotten Books of Eden and the Lost Books of the Bible

Obadiah 1:18 — Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:33:26 GMT

CLICK TO DOWNLOAD